We invite you to read these letters to the editor and opinion essays. Then adapt them for your own use, using your own words and your own experiences.

Please send good examples to Sandi Bean, sandra.j.bean.or[at]gmail.com.

Working together for health care
Corvallis Gazette-Times, July 8, 2018

By Edie Orner, Health Care for All Oregon - Albany (June 29)

On a recent Saturday morning, I was in front of the Linn County Courthouse, talking to folks and passing out literature about “Health Care for All Oregon,” an effort to make health care available to all residents of Oregon. Attempting to engage a man in conversation, his immediate reply was, “I’ve got Medicare—I’m all set,” to which I replied, “What about all the folks who can’t afford insurance and aren’t eligible for Medicare?” His reply, “That’s their problem. Health care is a privilege, not a right.” I said, “That must mean only the wealthy are entitled to health care.”

How can people be so selfish? I know folks like to explain it as the good old independent American idea—every man for himself. Haven’t we learned that working together, looking out for one another, cooperating with one another, is the best way to move ahead? Anyone who has any kind of religious affiliation has been made aware of a message to care for the poor and the sick. That message is part of all faith traditions!

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is credited with the following documented statement: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health is the most shocking and the most inhuman because it often results in physical death…. I see no alternative to direct action and creative nonviolence to raise the conscience of the nation.”

Hopefully, the conscience of all of us is being raised. In today’s more and more crowded world, we must begin to care about each other. Health care for all!

Medicare for All would benefit all
Corvallis Gazette-Times, November 6, 2017

by Jack Elder, former treasurer, Mid-Valley Health Care Advocates

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is a substantial improvement over the totally inadequate health insurance market that preceded it, but it is not without its problems. Some of these problems were pointed out in letters by Thomas Kraemer (Oct. 7) and John Brenan (Oct. 14).

But all of the often-repeated complaints about the weaknesses of ACA, including those of Mr. Kraemer, Mr. Brenan and many congressional Republicans, only strengthen the call for a single-payer health care system that would remove all of those weaknesses.

Why does our Congress continue its fruitless struggle to find a private-market insurance system that works, when we already have a single-payer system—Medicare—that works just fine for a large segment of our population? Why not just extend that to include everyone, as Canada did long ago?

A Medicare-for-all system would have no penalties for opting out (everyone is automatically included). No wasteful 20 percent overhead (Medicare overhead is 2 to 3 percent). No insurance premiums, co-pays, deductibles, or unaffordable prescription drug costs, providing savings to nearly all citizens that would exceed any tax increases necessary to fund the system.

Health care systems similar to Medicare are used effectively by many other countries at per-capita costs far below those that currently burden the U.S.

Complaints about the Affordable Care Act deserve our attention. They constitute strong arguments for replacing it with a comprehensive, affordable, single-payer system—Medicare for All.

Jack Elder (Oct. 30)

As I See It: Health care at a tipping point

(click here for Corvallis Gazette-Times article).

MARK WEISS, Oct 18, 2017 Updated Oct 19, 2017

As patient-centered medical care has taken hold in recent years, there’s been a growing interest in finding ways to use outcomes reported by individuals to help guide care.

A little over a year ago, after 27 years as a career counselor, I retired from Linn-Benton Community College. I have felt proud of spending so much of my life helping others find a better life for themselves, as part of the system of higher education. But now I live in fear. Fear for our graduates and fear for the future of higher education. The reason is the devastating effects on the world of employment being brought by the rising cost of health care.

In higher ed we tout our work as giving students a better life in the world of work, as well as making them stronger and better citizens. But the world of work is being destroyed, and we must react.

Many Americans were bemused when newspaper headlines told us that corporations like Walmart and McDonald’s were hiring primarily 17 hour a week employees, to avoid having to pay for their health insurance. And the truth is that many other corporations, and most public institutions, are doing the same. This includes hospitals and other health care groups. And it includes institutions of higher education, the very people purporting to prepare young Americans for their future.

But can we blame these businesses and institutions? When the cost of health insurance goes up 10-20 percent almost every year? When this cost doubles every 10 years? There isn’t anyone who can keep up with these costs and stay afloat, financially.

My own former employer, LBCC, a small college, spends over $7 million a year on health insurance (not including the portion the employees pay). LBCC could lower tuition rates and create more programs (and jobs) if it could use that money.

The United States appears to be the only country left in the world that ties health insurance to employment for most of its people. And thereby saddles every employer with an impossible hole in their budgets.

We must change our system. If we don’t, every college graduate can look forward to having two or three 17 hour-a-week jobs, and nothing more.

Fortunately, there are role models. At last count, 21 countries have gone to a “single payer," universal system of health care — cutting out the middle man, the insurance companies, with their heavy CEO salaries and their huge profit margins. With just one “payer” of the money, there is just one CEO, one set of rules, one set of forms, and all of a sudden, every doctor’s office can stop spending time and resources on fighting with insurance companies, and the amount of money saved could increase health care services and lower costs.

A recent Google search found researchers estimating a single-payer system would save the United States anywhere from $285 billion to $590 billion dollars per year. Imagine what that would do to the American economy.

Richard Master, CEO and founder of MCS Industries, has an exceptional video on what the cost of health insurance is doing to every business in America. It’s called “Fix It: Health Care At The Tipping Point.” It is free to be viewed on youtube. Please watch it.

If college and university leaders care for the future of their students, they will begin working for a single risk pool-single payer-universal health care program. Without it, one of the main reasons for the existence of higher education will be eliminated: better employment.

If this motivates you to help, you can join Mid-Valley Health Care Advocates. Just Google that name and you will find them. There are branches in both Albany and Corvallis.

 

Dated Feb 2, 2017, From Stuart Henderson in Florence

SINGLE PAYER OREGON

After years of promising to do away with President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Republicans have their chance. Their attempts will create a different set of winners and losers as big insurance crafts a for-profit business plan that will have little to do with health and much to do with the corporate bottom line.

Inevitably the model fails because of the large segments of the population that will be left to fend for themselves. Insurance corporations’ insistence to keep their hands in the health care money pot will be the downfall of the GOP attempt.

You might be surprised to learn that the answer is waiting in the wings in Oregon in 2020. A dedicated array of doctors, nurses, health professionals, business men and women, and thousands of citizens of all ages have been tirelessly organizing for a health care system that serves everyone in Oregon — that is equitable, affordable and able to provide high-quality universal health care, all while saving millions of dollars by employing a Medicare for All (single payer) system.

Please get used to the concept of single payer and research the success of countries that have employed it for decades. Visit the Health Care for All Oregon website at hcao.org and get involved.

When the time comes we will need every enlightened vote to overcome the vested interests and misleading advertisements authorized by Big Insurance and their corporate and political allies like those that helped defeat a similar measure in Colorado this year.

Stuart Henderson, Florence